Call 08000 277 323 any day, any time
The Clinical Negligence Team have recovered very substantial sums of compensation for clients in a number of medical negligence claims. Here are a selection of our most recent successful cases:
Our client presented to the maternity assessment unit with visual disturbances and high blood pressure. She was diagnosed with pre-eclampsia however no further action was taken.
One week later, she again presented with significant increased blood pressure, severe headache and abnormal urine analysis. Again, no further action was taken.
The following day, our client was admitted (now with a blood pressure in excess of 171/103), however suffered an eclamptic fit before delivery could be achieved. She then underwent an emergency caesarean section.
Our client suffered Post Traumatic Stress Disorder following the birth and continues to suffer with ongoing a generalised anxiety disorder.
Hannah Blackwell, Associate in the Clinical Negligence Team, acted for Mrs C following negligent treatment during and after her labour and delivery of her first child following an uncomplicated pregnancy. At two days over her due date, Mrs C started having contractions and on her initial visit to her local hospital she was discharged home at 4cms dilated. She later returned to hospital and labour progressed extremely slowly. During the final stages of labour, forceps were used to attempt to deliver her baby. Following the use of forceps it was noted that the baby’s heart rate had slowed. The decision was then made to undertake an emergency caesarean section. Thankfully, Mrs C’s baby was delivered safely and suffered no injury.
Following delivery, Mrs C suffered a postpartum haemorrhage. She was given a number of blood transfusions and a number of procedures were attempted to try and stop the bleeding. These attempts were unsuccessful and Mrs C underwent a full hysterectomy followed by an admission in the intensive care unit.
A claim was brought on the basis that when Mrs C initially attended the hospital and was noted to be 4cms dilated, the hospital staff failed to notice that she was in established labour and negligently discharged her home. This caused the labour to be prolonged, increasing the risk of post-partum haemorrhage. Further, the forceps were not used properly and should have been used at an earlier point in the labour. If the forceps has been used earlier then this would have decreased the amount of blood loss. It was also argued that the haemorrhage was not treated in a timely manner and procedures to stop the bleed could have been carried out at an earlier stage, which would have avoided the ultimate need for a hysterectomy.
Mrs C suffered from avoidable abdominal scarring and developed depression and anxiety and, as a result of the hysterectomy, she is unable to have any more children. Mrs C’s case settled out of Court for compensation of £100,000.
The Clinical Negligence Team acted for Mrs D who suffered anaesthetic awareness and psychiatric injury following a substandard caesarean section, and Mr D who suffered psychiatric injury from witnessing these events.
Mrs D underwent a caesarean section but the incision extended into the surrounding blood vessels, including an artery. The injury was not quickly repaired and Mrs D suffered heavy bleeding. Mr D witnessed this and saw his wife’s condition rapidly deteriorate, which led him to believe that she was dying. He was asked to leave the room and was not provided with any information about his wife for a number of hours.
When Mr D was asked if she wanted to know what was happening, she opted not to, and to have a general anaesthetic so that she would not be aware of what she believed was her impending death. There was a delay in providing blood products and starting a blood transfusion, causing a fall in blood pressure. During the latter part of the surgery Mrs D suffered anaesthetic awareness. She could hear the surgery, but could not see or move and initially thought she had died.
Both Mr and Mrs D sustained psychiatric injury. Their cases were settled out of Court for £30,000, wit Mrs D receiving £18,000 and Mr D receiving £12,000 in compensation.
The Clinical Negligence Team recovered £45,000 for a client after a midwife failed to examine her following a perineal tear.
The Mother had to undergo a late repair of her third/fourth degree tear and had a temporary colostomy bag put in place. Because the midwife had failed to recognise the true extent of the tear, the Claimant suffered more harm than if the tear had been repaired immediately. The Claimant also suffered from stress during this time and sexual difficulties. She had mild depression.
Joachim Stanley acted for Ms T, who underwent a cervical stitch (cervical cerclage) procedure during her pregnancy. The stitch became infected due to negligence during the procedure. As a result of the infection her unborn child sadly died. She suffered a psychiatric injury and required a considerable amount of care from her family. Ms T received compensation of £45,000.
During the birth of her child, a client of the Clinical Negligence Team suffered a third degree perineal tear due to a negligently performed episiotomy. The Obstetrician then failed to recognise the extent of the tear and performed an inadequate repair in poor light.
Our client suffered faecal incontinence which causes her a great amount of distress, and will have to undergo late repair surgery once her family is complete. Our client’s husband had to change jobs due to her injuries and there were significant financial losses.
Our client received £250,000 in an out of court settlement for her pain and suffering and financial losses.